Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 137.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3 W | Power Consumption | 7,215 W |
| 18.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 9 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Intel | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Both the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M63S are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M63S sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M63S 284572% more hashrate (0.1 vs 390.0 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 7,215.0 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 1% better efficiency (18.3 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 289519% more heat output (8.5 vs 24,617.6 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$3.12 |
| -$0 | Net after 1 year | -$13,140 |
| -$1 | Net after 2 years | -$14,279 |
| -$1 | Net after 3 years | -$15,419 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the Whatsminer M63S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Whatsminer M63S?
The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 0.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficiency (18.3 vs 18.5 J/TH).