SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS3 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 17678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). That said, the SuperScalar K10 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3 17678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 42% better power draw (1,845 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 400 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 39% better weight (8.3 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 73% more heat output (6,295 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,600.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (41,000 vs 400 J/TH).