iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) | Specification | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 40.2 TH/s |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 3,350 W |
| 48.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 83.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 580 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 68/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)
Goldshell KD Max
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better power draw (170 vs 3,350 W). That said, the Goldshell KD Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) and Goldshell KD Max sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD Max 1049% more hashrate (3.5 vs 40.2 TH/s)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 95% better power draw (170 vs 3,350 W)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 42% better efficiency (48.6 vs 83.3 J/TH)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 100% better weight (2.2 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD Max 1871% more heat output (580 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) 209% more home mining score (68.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) | Metric | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,320 |
| -$0.28 | Daily net profit | -$6.59 |
| -$103 | Net after 1 year | -$3,726 |
| -$206 | Net after 2 years | -$6,132 |
| -$309 | Net after 3 years | -$8,539 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)Score: 68/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH)48.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) or the Goldshell KD Max?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-6.59/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) vs Goldshell KD Max: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) scores 68/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) and Goldshell KD Max?
The iBeLink K3 mini (3.5TH) runs at 48.6 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH — a difference of 34.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (48.6 vs 83.3 J/TH).