Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS3 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 8.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 3900% more hashrate (0.2 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 20% better efficiency (500 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 81% better weight (2.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 3100% more heat output (341 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$164 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$249 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$334 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro or Iceriver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficiency (500 vs 400 J/TH).