Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 226.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS5M edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 1400% more hashrate (15.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 82% better power draw (3,400 vs 600 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 62% better efficiency (227 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS1 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 467% more heat output (11,601 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more home mining score (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $449 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.62 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$6,012 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$8,793 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or Iceriver KS1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS1 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 373.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (227 vs 600 J/TH).