Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD-BOX

Goldshell KD-BOX

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 205 W Efficiency 128.1 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD Max

Goldshell KD Max

Hashrate 40.2 TH/s Power 3,350 W Efficiency 83.3 J/TH

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD Max

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD-BOX Specification Goldshell KD Max
1.6 TH/s Hashrate 40.2 TH/s
205 W Power Consumption 3,350 W
128.1 J/TH Efficiency 83.3 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 8,500.0 kg
700 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,430 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000074 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.49
Daily Profit -$0.43
Monthly -$13.03
Yearly -$158.56

Goldshell KD Max

Daily Revenue 0.00001850 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.59
Monthly -$197.79
Yearly -$2,406.46

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD Max, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2413% more hashrate (1.6 vs 40.2 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD Max's favour. That said, the Goldshell KD-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell KD Max — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell KD-BOX and Goldshell KD Max actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell KD Max 2413% more hashrate (1.6 vs 40.2 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 94% better power draw (205 vs 3,350 W)
  • Goldshell KD Max 35% better efficiency (128.1 vs 83.3 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD Max 1534% more heat output (700 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell KD-BOX 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD-BOX Metric Goldshell KD Max
$330 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,320
-$0.43 Daily net profit -$6.59
-$489 Net after 1 year -$3,726
-$647 Net after 2 years -$6,133
-$806 Net after 3 years -$8,539
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell KD-BOX

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD Max

83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell KD-BOX or Goldshell KD Max more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX is more profitable at $-0.43/day compared to $-6.59/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD Max: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD Max: which fits a residential setup better?

The Goldshell KD-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell KD-BOX vs Goldshell KD Max: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell KD-BOX runs at 128.1 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH — a difference of 44.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficiency (128.1 vs 83.3 J/TH).