Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell KD5

Goldshell KD5

Hashrate 18.0 TH/s Power 2,250 W Efficiency 125.0 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD6-SE

Goldshell KD6-SE

Hashrate 25.3 TH/s Power 2,300 W Efficiency 90.9 J/TH

Goldshell KD5 vs Goldshell KD6-SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD5 Specification Goldshell KD6-SE
18.0 TH/s Hashrate 25.3 TH/s
2,250 W Power Consumption 2,300 W
125.0 J/TH Efficiency 90.9 J/TH
Noise Level
8,500.0 kg Weight 8,500.0 kg
7,677 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,848 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithm Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD5

Daily Revenue 0.00000828 BTC $0.65
Daily Electricity -$5.40
Daily Profit -$4.75
Monthly -$142.55
Yearly -$1,734.40

Goldshell KD6-SE

Daily Revenue 0.00001164 BTC $0.91
Daily Electricity -$5.52
Daily Profit -$4.61
Monthly -$138.27
Yearly -$1,682.24

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD6-SE, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 41% more hashrate (18.0 vs 25.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell KD5 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell KD6-SE — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KD5 and Goldshell KD6-SE sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell KD6-SE 41% more hashrate (18.0 vs 25.3 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD5 2% better power draw (2,250 vs 2,300 W)
  • Goldshell KD6-SE 27% better efficiency (125.0 vs 90.9 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD6-SE 2% more heat output (7,677 vs 7,848 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD5 Metric Goldshell KD6-SE
$1,998 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,016
-$4.75 Daily net profit -$4.61
-$3,732 Net after 1 year -$2,698
-$5,467 Net after 2 years -$4,380
-$7,201 Net after 3 years -$6,063
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD6-SE

90.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell KD5 or Goldshell KD6-SE more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD6-SE is more profitable at $-4.61/day compared to $-4.75/day for the Goldshell KD5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell KD5 vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell KD5 or the Goldshell KD6-SE?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Goldshell KD5 vs Goldshell KD6-SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell KD5 runs at 125.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6-SE runs at 90.9 J/TH — a difference of 34.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficiency (125.0 vs 90.9 J/TH).