Iceriver KS3 vs Iceriver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 17.1 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KS3
Iceriver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS3, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 29% better efficiency (400 vs 567 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. The Iceriver KS3M claws back ground on price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KS3 and Iceriver KS3M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 33% more hashrate (8.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KS3 29% better efficiency (400 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 21% better weight (13.5 vs 17.1 kg)
- Iceriver KS3M 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $730 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $320 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$3,428 | Net after 1 year | -$3,220 |
| -$6,126 | Net after 2 years | -$6,119 |
| -$8,825 | Net after 3 years | -$9,019 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KS3 or the Iceriver KS3M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.94/day for the Iceriver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver KS3 or Iceriver KS3M?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver KS3 vs Iceriver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver KS3 and Iceriver KS3M?
The Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficiency (400 vs 567 J/TH).