Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Hashrate 1.3 TH/s Power 185 W Efficiency 142.3 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1

Todek Toddminer C1

Hashrate 1.6 TH/s Power 1,380 W Efficiency 890.3 J/TH

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) vs Todek Toddminer C1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) Specification Todek Toddminer C1
1.3 TH/s Hashrate 1.6 TH/s
185 W Power Consumption 1,380 W
142.3 J/TH Efficiency 890.3 J/TH
Noise Level
2.2 kg Weight 4,600.0 kg
631 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,709 BTU/hr
33/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithm Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000060 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$0.44
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.92
Yearly -$144.98

Todek Toddminer C1

Daily Revenue 0.00000071 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$3.26
Monthly -$97.69
Yearly -$1,188.51

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 87% better power draw (185 vs 1,380 W). That said, the Todek Toddminer C1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) and Todek Toddminer C1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Todek Toddminer C1 19% more hashrate (1.3 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 87% better power draw (185 vs 1,380 W)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 84% better efficiency (142 vs 890 J/TH)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (2.2 vs 4,600.0 kg)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 646% more heat output (631 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 6% more home mining score (33.0 vs 31.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) or the Todek Toddminer C1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-3.26/day for the Todek Toddminer C1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) vs Todek Toddminer C1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) or the Todek Toddminer C1?

The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Todek Toddminer C1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) and Todek Toddminer C1 on J/TH?

The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 748.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (142 vs 890 J/TH).