StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| StrongU STU-U8 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| 46.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 TH/s |
| 2,100 W | Power Consumption | 2,145 W |
| 45.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,200.0 kg | Weight | 8,550.0 kg |
| 7,165 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,319 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| StrongU | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
StrongU STU-U8
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Based on BTC price of $77,884 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the StrongU STU-U8, which leads on 3 of 3 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 30% better efficiency (45.7 vs 65.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the StrongU STU-U8 and MicroBT Whatsminer M10 sit on each measurable spec:
- StrongU STU-U8 39% more hashrate (46.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
- StrongU STU-U8 2% better power draw (2,100 vs 2,145 W)
- StrongU STU-U8 30% better efficiency (45.7 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- StrongU STU-U8 4% better weight (8,200 vs 8,550 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 2% more heat output (7,165 vs 7,319 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| StrongU STU-U8 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$3.39 | Daily net profit | -$3.97 |
| -$1,238 | Net after 1 year | -$3,947 |
| -$2,476 | Net after 2 years | -$5,395 |
| -$3,713 | Net after 3 years | -$6,842 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U845.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the StrongU STU-U8 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U8 is more profitable at $-3.39/day compared to $-3.97/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
StrongU STU-U8 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the StrongU STU-U8 or MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between StrongU STU-U8 and MicroBT Whatsminer M10?
The StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficiency (45.7 vs 65.0 J/TH).