iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Hashrate | 520.0 MH/s |
| 1,240 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
Jasminer X4-1U
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X4-1U comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 240 W). The iPollo V1 Classic holds the edge in hashrate and price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4-1U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 Classic 198% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-1U 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X4-1U 42% better efficiency (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Classic 417% more heat output (4,231 vs 819 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-1U |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $209 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$419 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$629 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$840 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-1U461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4-1U more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4-1U?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-1U: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-1U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 338,461.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficiency (800,000 vs 461,538 J/TH).