iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Specification | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 857,142.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 480,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 793% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X4's favour. That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4 sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X4 793% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 80% better power draw (240 vs 1,200 W)
- Jasminer X4 44% better efficiency (857,143 vs 480,000 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 400% more heat output (819 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Metric | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$2.88 |
| -$579 | Net after 1 year | -$2,050 |
| -$789 | Net after 2 years | -$3,101 |
| -$1,000 | Net after 3 years | -$4,153 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4480,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or the Jasminer X4 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or Jasminer X4?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4 on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus runs at 857,142.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 377,142.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficiency (857,143 vs 480,000 J/TH).