iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s |
| 104 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 480,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X4 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1823% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X4 1823% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 91% better power draw (104 vs 1,200 W)
- Jasminer X4 40% better efficiency (800,000 vs 480,000 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 1054% more heat output (355 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4 |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$2.88 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$2,050 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$3,101 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$4,153 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4480,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or the Jasminer X4 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4?
The Jasminer X4 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 320,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficiency (800,000 vs 480,000 J/TH).