Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 | Specification | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 3,100 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 861,111.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1
iPollo X1
Based on BTC price of $74,273 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on specs, the iPollo X1 offers 7% better efficiency at 800,000.0 J/TH compared to the iPollo V1 at 861,111.1 J/TH. This directly impacts daily operating costs and long-term profitability.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo X1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo X1800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 or iPollo X1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 or iPollo X1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 or iPollo X1?
The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 and iPollo X1?
The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 61,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.