Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1

iPollo G1

Hashrate 36.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 77,777.8 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Hashrate 300.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo G1 vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Specification iPollo X1
36.0 GH/s Hashrate 300.0 MH/s
2,800 W Power Consumption 240 W
77,777.8 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
19,000.0 kg Weight 1.5 kg
9,554 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.56
Yearly -$2,452.33

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo G1 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 11900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo G1's favour. The iPollo X1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo G1 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The iPollo G1 and iPollo X1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo G1 11900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 91% better power draw (2,800 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo G1 90% better efficiency (77,778 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 100% better weight (19,000.0 vs 1.5 kg)
  • iPollo G1 1067% more heat output (9,554 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo X1 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Metric iPollo X1
$1,599 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$6.72 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$4,051 Net after 1 year -$654
-$6,504 Net after 2 years -$864
-$8,956 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo X1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1

77,777.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo G1 or the iPollo X1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-6.72/day for the iPollo G1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo G1 or iPollo X1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo G1 or iPollo X1?

The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo G1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo G1 and iPollo X1?

The iPollo G1 runs at 77,777.8 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 722,222.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficiency (77,778 vs 800,000 J/TH).