Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2 | Specification | iPollo X1 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 300.0 MH/s |
| 1,500 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 150,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.5 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 5,118 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 48/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2
iPollo X1
Based on BTC price of $74,859 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2 wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The iPollo X1 holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V2 or iPollo X1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V2 or iPollo X1?
The iPollo V2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2 or iPollo X1?
The iPollo V2 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2 and iPollo X1?
The iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 650,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.