Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Hashrate 58.0 TH/s Power 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2

iPollo V2

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 1,500 W Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH

iPollo B1L vs iPollo V2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo B1L Specification iPollo V2
58.0 TH/s Hashrate 10.0 GH/s
3,000 W Power Consumption 1,500 W
51.7 J/TH Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
12,700.0 kg Weight 16.5 kg
10,236 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,118 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 48/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002669 BTC $2.09
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.41
Yearly -$1,866.51

iPollo V2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.60
Daily Profit -$3.60
Monthly -$107.99
Yearly -$1,313.87

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo B1L wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 579900% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo B1L's favour. The iPollo V2 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo B1L — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and iPollo V2 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo B1L 579900% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2 50% better power draw (3,000 vs 1,500 W)
  • iPollo B1L 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 150,000.0 J/TH)
  • iPollo V2 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 16.5 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 100% more heat output (10,236 vs 5,118 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2 118% more home mining score (22.0 vs 48.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo B1L Metric iPollo V2
$430 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,140
-$5.11 Daily net profit -$3.60
-$2,297 Net after 1 year -$6,454
-$4,163 Net after 2 years -$7,768
-$6,030 Net after 3 years -$9,082
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2

Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo B1L

51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2 is more profitable at $-3.60/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo B1L or iPollo V2?

The iPollo V2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V2?

The iPollo V2 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and iPollo V2?

The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 149,948.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (51.7 vs 150,000.0 J/TH).