Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V1 Hyd

iPollo V1 Hyd

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 800 W Efficiency 888,888.9 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2

iPollo V2

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 1,500 W Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Hyd Specification iPollo V2
900.0 MH/s Hashrate 10.0 GH/s
800 W Power Consumption 1,500 W
888,888.9 J/TH Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
8.0 kg Weight 16.5 kg
2,730 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,118 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 48/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.92
Daily Profit -$1.92
Monthly -$57.60
Yearly -$700.79

iPollo V2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.60
Daily Profit -$3.60
Monthly -$107.99
Yearly -$1,313.87

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iPollo V2 wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Hyd claws back ground on power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V2 — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V2 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo V2 1011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 47% better power draw (800 vs 1,500 W)
  • iPollo V2 83% better efficiency (888,889 vs 150,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Hyd 52% better weight (8.0 vs 16.5 kg)
  • iPollo V2 88% more heat output (2,730 vs 5,118 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2 60% more home mining score (30.0 vs 48.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Hyd Metric iPollo V2
$489 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,140
-$1.92 Daily net profit -$3.60
-$1,190 Net after 1 year -$6,454
-$1,891 Net after 2 years -$7,768
-$2,591 Net after 3 years -$9,082
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2

Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2

150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V2: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Hyd or iPollo V2?

The iPollo V2 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V2?

The iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH while the iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 738,888.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (888,889 vs 150,000 J/TH).