Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo V2

iPollo V2

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 1,500 W Efficiency 150,000.0 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X16-QE

Jasminer X16-QE

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 550 W Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH

iPollo V2 vs Jasminer X16-QE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V2 Specification Jasminer X16-QE
10.0 GH/s Hashrate 1.8 GH/s
1,500 W Power Consumption 550 W
150,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 314,285.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 40 dB
16.5 kg Weight 10.0 kg
5,118 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,877 BTU/hr
48/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V2

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.60
Daily Profit -$3.60
Monthly -$107.99
Yearly -$1,313.89

Jasminer X16-QE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.32
Daily Profit -$1.32
Monthly -$39.60
Yearly -$481.78

Based on BTC price of $69,609 and current network difficulty as of Mar 24, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the iPollo V2 and Jasminer X16-QE are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-QE

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2

150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-QE more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-3.60/day for the iPollo V2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-QE?

The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-QE?

The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 48/100 for the iPollo V2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2 and Jasminer X16-QE?

The iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH — a difference of 164,285.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.