iPollo X1 vs Jasminer X16-Q pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo X1 | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.1 GH/s |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 520 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 253,658.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 1.5 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,774 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo X1
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Jasminer X16-Q pro wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 583% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo X1 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo X1 and Jasminer X16-Q pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 583% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo X1 54% better power draw (240 vs 520 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 68% better efficiency (800,000 vs 253,659 J/TH)
- iPollo X1 86% better weight (1.5 vs 10.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 117% more heat output (819 vs 1,774 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 110% more home mining score (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo X1 | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q pro |
|---|---|---|
| $444 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,249 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$1.25 |
| -$654 | Net after 1 year | -$1,704 |
| -$864 | Net after 2 years | -$2,160 |
| -$1,075 | Net after 3 years | -$2,615 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo X1 or Jasminer X16-Q pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.25/day for the Jasminer X16-Q pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo X1 or the Jasminer X16-Q pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo X1 or Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo X1 and Jasminer X16-Q pro?
The iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH — a difference of 546,341.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (800,000 vs 253,659 J/TH).