Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4-C 1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-QE | Specification | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 GH/s | Hashrate | 450.0 MH/s |
| 550 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 314,285.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 533,333.3 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,877 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-QE
Jasminer X4-C 1U
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-QE, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 289% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Jasminer X4-C 1U holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Jasminer X16-QE and Jasminer X4-C 1U actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X16-QE 289% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 56% better power draw (550 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X16-QE 41% better efficiency (314,286 vs 533,333 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 129% more heat output (1,877 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 110% more home mining score (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-QE | Metric | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| $469 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $658 |
| -$1.32 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$951 | Net after 1 year | -$868 |
| -$1,433 | Net after 2 years | -$1,078 |
| -$1,914 | Net after 3 years | -$1,289 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-QE314,285.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Jasminer X16-QE or Jasminer X4-C 1U more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-C 1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.32/day for the Jasminer X16-QE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-QE or Jasminer X4-C 1U?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4-C 1U at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X4-C 1U: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Jasminer X4-C 1U). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-QE and Jasminer X4-C 1U?
The Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-C 1U runs at 533,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 219,047.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficiency (314,286 vs 533,333 J/TH).