Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.7 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS6 SE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1027678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6 SE's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS6 SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS6 SE 1027678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$8.05 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,999 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,939 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$9,878 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6 SE918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max is more profitable at $-7.92/day compared to $-8.05/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS6 SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell HS6 SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,165,747.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 919 J/TH).