Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.7 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $64,314 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell HS6 SE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 685085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS6 SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS6 SE 685085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$8.05 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,999 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,938 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$9,877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6 SE918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max II is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-8.05/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS6 SE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS6 SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS6 SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,007.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 919 J/TH).