Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.7 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $64,353 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6 SE, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 9999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS6 SE 9999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 89% better power draw (360 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 844% more heat output (1,228 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$8.05 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,999 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$6,938 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$9,877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6 SE918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-8.05/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell HS6 SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS6 SE on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,728,810.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 919 J/TH).