Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 2,340 W | Consommation électrique | 620 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $63,875 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) et le Jasminer X16-Q sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and Jasminer X16-Q actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 362% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 74% better power draw (2,340 vs 620 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 18% better efficacité (260,000 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 277% more heat output (7,984 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 63% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $789 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$1,332 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$1,875 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$2,418 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the Jasminer X16-Q?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or Jasminer X16-Q?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 57,948.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficacité (260,000 vs 317,949 J/TH).