Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer L9

Antminer L9

Taux de hachage 16,000.0 MH/s Puissance 3,360 W Efficiency 210,000.0 J/TH
VS
VOLCMINER D1

VOLCMINER D1

Taux de hachage 17.0 GH/s Puissance 3,900 W Efficiency 229,411.8 J/TH

Antminer L9 vs VOLCMINER D1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer L9 Specification VOLCMINER D1
16,000.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 17.0 GH/s
3,360 W Consommation électrique 3,900 W
210,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 229,411.8 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.8 kg Weight
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,307 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme Scrypt
Bitmain Manufacturer VOLCMINER

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer L9

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$8.06
Monthly -$241.91
Yearly -$2,943.19

VOLCMINER D1

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.36
Daily Profit -$9.36
Monthly -$280.79
Yearly -$3,416.22

Based on BTC price of $63,208 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer L9 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 14% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,900 W). The VOLCMINER D1 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer L9 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer L9 and VOLCMINER D1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • VOLCMINER D1 6% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer L9 14% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,900 W)
  • Antminer L9 8% better efficacité (210,000 vs 229,412 J/TH)
  • VOLCMINER D1 16% more heat output (11,464 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer L9 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer L9 Metric VOLCMINER D1
$6,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,465
-$8.06 Daily net profit -$9.36
-$9,443 Net after 1 year -$6,881
-$12,386 Net after 2 years -$10,297
-$15,330 Net after 3 years -$13,714
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer L9

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer L9

210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer L9 or VOLCMINER D1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L9 is more profitable at $-8.06/day compared to $-9.36/day for the VOLCMINER D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer L9 or the VOLCMINER D1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer L9 or VOLCMINER D1?

The Antminer L9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer L9 vs VOLCMINER D1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer L9 runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 runs at 229,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 19,411.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (210,000 vs 229,412 J/TH).