Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs 14.0 TH/s at 96.4 J/TH; the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition runs 50.0 TH/s at 40 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 24/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition
Based on BTC price of $65,075 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 257% more hashrate (14.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 33% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,000 W)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 57% better weight (6.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition 48% more heat output (4,606 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 146% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 24.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$2.78 | Daily net profit | -$3.16 |
| -$1,364 | Net after 1 year | -$1,953 |
| -$2,380 | Net after 2 years | -$3,108 |
| -$3,395 | Net after 3 years | -$4,262 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.78/day compared to $-3.16/day for the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 24/100 for the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 56.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (96.4 vs 40.0 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Loki Edition (S9) with...
Compare Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition with...
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S9 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Bitcoin Space Heater S19 Edition
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
- Bitcoin Space Heater S17 Edition vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)