Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Avalon A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Specification | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 11.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)
Avalon A1466
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Avalon A1466 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 105% more hashrate (73.0 vs 150.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1466's favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Avalon A1466 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1466 105% more hashrate (73.0 vs 150.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 10% better power draw (2,920 vs 3,230 W)
- Avalon A1466 46% better efficacité (40.0 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) 14% better weight (11.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Avalon A1466 11% more heat output (9,963 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1466 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) | Metric | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,200 |
| -$4.90 | Daily net profit | -$3.42 |
| -$2,338 | Net after 1 year | -$5,448 |
| -$4,126 | Net after 2 years | -$6,695 |
| -$5,914 | Net after 3 years | -$7,943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1466Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Avalon A1466: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-3.42/day compared to $-4.90/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) or Avalon A1466?
The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) vs Avalon A1466: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) and Avalon A1466?
The Bitmain Antminer S17+ (73Th) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 18.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficacité (40.0 vs 21.5 J/TH).