Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Avalon A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Avalon A1466
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1466, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 200% more hashrate (50.0 vs 150.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Avalon A1466 sit on each measurable spec:
- Avalon A1466 200% more hashrate (50.0 vs 150.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 39% better power draw (1,975 vs 3,230 W)
- Avalon A1466 45% better efficacité (39.5 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 26% better weight (9.5 vs 12.8 kg)
- Avalon A1466 64% more heat output (6,739 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1466 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | Avalon A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,200 |
| -$3.30 | Daily net profit | -$3.42 |
| -$1,616 | Net after 1 year | -$5,448 |
| -$2,819 | Net after 2 years | -$6,695 |
| -$4,021 | Net after 3 years | -$7,943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1466Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or Avalon A1466 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) is more profitable at $-3.30/day compared to $-3.42/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Avalon A1466: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or Avalon A1466?
The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Avalon A1466?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 18.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (39.5 vs 21.5 J/TH).