Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 7,215 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 13.2 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M63S edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 255% more hashrate (110 vs 390 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Whatsminer M63S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63S 255% more hashrate (110 vs 390 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 55% better power draw (3,250 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 37% better efficacité (29.6 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 53% better weight (13.2 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 122% more heat output (11,089 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 100% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$6.20 |
| -$2,063 | Net after 1 year | -$14,264 |
| -$3,766 | Net after 2 years | -$16,529 |
| -$5,469 | Net after 3 years | -$18,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M63S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) is more profitable at $-4.67/day compared to $-6.20/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Whatsminer M63S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M63S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Whatsminer M63S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 11.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (29.6 vs 18.5 J/TH).