Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S7

Bitmain Antminer S7

Taux de hachage 4.7 TH/s Puissance 1,293 W Efficiency 273.4 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S7 Specification Auradine Teraflux AI3680
4.7 TH/s Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s
1,293 W Consommation électrique 5,625 W
273.4 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 55 dB
3.9 kg Weight
4,412 BTU/hr BTU Output 19,193 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S7

Daily Revenue 0.00000214 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$3.10
Daily Profit -$2.97
Monthly -$88.97
Yearly -$1,082.51

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016965 BTC $10.90
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$2.60
Monthly -$78.14
Yearly -$950.74

Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 7828% more hashrate (4.7 vs 375.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S7 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 7828% more hashrate (4.7 vs 375.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S7 77% better power draw (1,293 vs 5,625 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 95% better efficacité (273.4 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 335% more heat output (4,412 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S7

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S7 or the Auradine Teraflux AI3680?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-2.97/day for the Bitmain Antminer S7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitmain Antminer S7 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S7 runs at 273.4 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 258.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (273.4 vs 15.0 J/TH).