Bitmain Antminer S7 vs Whatsminer M30S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S7 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 112.0 TH/s |
| 1,293 W | Consommation électrique | 3,472 W |
| 273.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 3.9 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 4,412 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S7
Whatsminer M30S++
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M30S++ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 2268% more hashrate (4.7 vs 112.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M30S++'s favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S7 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Whatsminer M30S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M30S++ 2268% more hashrate (4.7 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S7 63% better power draw (1,293 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 89% better efficacité (273.4 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S7 68% better weight (3.9 vs 12.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 169% more heat output (4,412 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S7 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,300 |
| -$2.97 | Daily net profit | -$5.14 |
| -$1,083 | Net after 1 year | -$4,177 |
| -$2,167 | Net after 2 years | -$6,053 |
| -$3,250 | Net after 3 years | -$7,930 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S++Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S7 or Whatsminer M30S++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S7 is more profitable at $-2.97/day compared to $-5.14/day for the Whatsminer M30S++. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S7 or the Whatsminer M30S++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M30S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S7 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S7 or the Whatsminer M30S++?
The Whatsminer M30S++ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S7 and Whatsminer M30S++ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S7 runs at 273.4 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 242.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficacité (273.4 vs 31.0 J/TH).