MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs Whatsminer M30S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M30S++ is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs 68.0 TH/s at 49.4 J/TH; the Whatsminer M30S++ runs 112.0 TH/s at 31 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M20S | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 68.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 112.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,472 W |
| 49.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
Whatsminer M30S++
Based on BTC price of $65,847 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M30S++ l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 65% more hashrate (68.0 vs 112.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M30S++'s favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S and Whatsminer M30S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S++ 65% more hashrate (68.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 3% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 37% better efficacité (49.4 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 4% better weight (12.5 vs 12.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 3% more heat output (11,464 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M20S | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $66 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,300 |
| -$5.81 | Daily net profit | -$4.62 |
| -$2,187 | Net after 1 year | -$3,987 |
| -$4,308 | Net after 2 years | -$5,674 |
| -$6,429 | Net after 3 years | -$7,361 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S or the Whatsminer M30S++?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S++ is more profitable at $-4.62/day compared to $-5.81/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S or the Whatsminer M30S++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M30S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S or the Whatsminer M30S++?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs Whatsminer M30S++: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs at 49.4 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 18.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (49.4 vs 31.0 J/TH).