MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M30S++ is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 5 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs 55.0 TH/s at 63.6 J/TH; the Whatsminer M30S++ runs 112.0 TH/s at 31 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 112.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,472 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 31.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.7 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,847 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Whatsminer M30S++
Based on BTC price of $65,342 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M30S++ edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 51% better efficacité (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M30S++'s favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M30S++ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S++ 104% more hashrate (55.0 vs 112.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 1% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,472 W)
- Whatsminer M30S++ 51% better efficacité (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 11% better weight (10.7 vs 12.0 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 1% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,847 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | Whatsminer M30S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,300 |
| -$6.59 | Daily net profit | -$4.65 |
| -$6,206 | Net after 1 year | -$3,997 |
| -$8,612 | Net after 2 years | -$5,695 |
| -$11,018 | Net after 3 years | -$7,392 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S++31.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S++ is more profitable at $-4.65/day compared to $-6.59/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs Whatsminer M30S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M30S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or Whatsminer M30S++?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and Whatsminer M30S++ on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S++ runs at 31.0 J/TH — a difference of 32.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 51% better efficacité (63.6 vs 31.0 J/TH).