Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AI3680 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 375.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 5,625 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,193 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 650% more hashrate (50.0 vs 375.0 TH/s). The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 650% more hashrate (50.0 vs 375.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 64% better power draw (2,000 vs 5,625 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 63% better efficacité (40.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 21% better noise (70.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 181% more heat output (6,824 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Auradine Teraflux AI3680 |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.36 | Daily net profit | -$2.66 |
| -$1,825 | Net after 1 year | -$973 |
| -$3,049 | Net after 2 years | -$1,945 |
| -$4,274 | Net after 3 years | -$2,918 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)Score: 42/100. 70 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-3.36/day for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (40.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Gamma
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
