Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Whatsminer M66S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Specification | Whatsminer M66S |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 298.0 TH/s |
| 2,000 W | Consommation électrique | 5,518 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 6,824 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,827 BTU/hr |
| 42/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S17)
Whatsminer M66S
Based on BTC price of $62,980 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M66S l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 496% more hashrate (50.0 vs 298.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M66S's favour. That said, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Whatsminer M66S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M66S 496% more hashrate (50.0 vs 298.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 64% better power draw (2,000 vs 5,518 W)
- Whatsminer M66S 54% better efficacité (40.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M66S 29% better noise (70.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 44% better weight (7.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M66S 176% more heat output (6,824 vs 18,827 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M66S 5% more score de minage domestique (42.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S17) | Metric | Whatsminer M66S |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,000 |
| -$3.38 | Daily net profit | -$4.75 |
| -$1,832 | Net after 1 year | -$9,735 |
| -$3,064 | Net after 2 years | -$11,469 |
| -$4,296 | Net after 3 years | -$13,204 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M66SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M66S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Whatsminer M66S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is more profitable at $-3.38/day compared to $-4.75/day for the Whatsminer M66S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Whatsminer M66S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M66S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or Whatsminer M66S?
The Whatsminer M66S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 42/100 for the Antminer Slim Edition (S17)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and Whatsminer M66S?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M66S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 21.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (40.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).
Compare Antminer Slim Edition (S17) with...
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Gamma
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe GT
- Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs Bitaxe Hex