Antminer T17+ vs Whatsminer M30S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer T17+ | Specification | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 50.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer T17+
Whatsminer M30S+
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M30S+ l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 56% more hashrate (64.0 vs 100.0 TH/s). The Antminer T17+ holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer T17+ and Whatsminer M30S+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M30S+ 56% more hashrate (64.0 vs 100.0 TH/s)
- Antminer T17+ 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 32% better efficacité (50.0 vs 34.0 J/TH)
- Antminer T17+ 13% better weight (10.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17+ 133% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer T17+ | Metric | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$5.85 | Daily net profit | -$5.31 |
| -$2,136 | Net after 1 year | -$3,737 |
| -$4,273 | Net after 2 years | -$5,673 |
| -$6,409 | Net after 3 years | -$7,610 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S+34.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer T17+ vs Whatsminer M30S+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M30S+ is more profitable at $-5.31/day compared to $-5.85/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer T17+ or Whatsminer M30S+?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer T17+ or Whatsminer M30S+?
The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Whatsminer M30S+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer T17+ and Whatsminer M30S+?
The Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (50.0 vs 34.0 J/TH).