Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 58.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 12.7 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AI3680 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 547% more hashrate (375.0 vs 58.0 TH/s). The iPollo B1L holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and iPollo B1L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 547% more hashrate (375.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 47% better power draw (5,625 vs 3,000 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 71% better efficacité (15.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 88% more heat output (19,193 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$2.58 | Daily net profit | -$5.51 |
| -$943 | Net after 1 year | -$2,442 |
| -$1,887 | Net after 2 years | -$4,454 |
| -$2,830 | Net after 3 years | -$6,465 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo B1LScore: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the iPollo B1L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.58/day compared to $-5.51/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or iPollo B1L?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or iPollo B1L?
The iPollo B1L scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and iPollo B1L on J/TH?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 36.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (15.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17