Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
NerdQAxe

NerdQAxe

Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s Puissance 80 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs NerdQAxe

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification NerdQAxe
375.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 TH/s
5,625 W Consommation électrique 80 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
55 dB Niveau de bruit 40 dB
Weight 0.4 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 273 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 71/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016965 BTC $10.84
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$2.66
Monthly -$79.95
Yearly -$972.72

NerdQAxe

Daily Revenue 0.00000090 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.19
Daily Profit -$0.13
Monthly -$4.03
Yearly -$48.99

Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AI3680 l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 18650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 2.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. The NerdQAxe holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and NerdQAxe diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 18650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
  • NerdQAxe 99% better power draw (5,625.0 vs 80.0 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 63% better efficacité (15.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
  • NerdQAxe 27% better noise (55.0 vs 40.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 6930% more heat output (19,193 vs 273 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Metric NerdQAxe
Upfront cost (MSRP) $249
-$2.66 Daily net profit -$0.13
-$973 Net after 1 year -$298
-$1,945 Net after 2 years -$347
-$2,918 Net after 3 years -$396
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

NerdQAxe

Score: 71/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs NerdQAxe: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdQAxe is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or NerdQAxe?

The NerdQAxe is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs NerdQAxe: which fits a residential setup better?

The NerdQAxe scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs NerdQAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the NerdQAxe runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (15.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).