Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Innosilicon T3 50T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Innosilicon T3 50T |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 62.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Innosilicon T3 50T
Based on BTC price of $64,221 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 50.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AI3680's favour. The Innosilicon T3 50T holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T3 50T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 650% more hashrate (375.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T3 50T 45% better power draw (5,625 vs 3,100 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 76% better efficacité (15.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 81% more heat output (19,193 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T3 50TScore: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T3 50T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-5.99/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Innosilicon T3 50T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 50T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Innosilicon T3 50T?
The Innosilicon T3 50T scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Innosilicon T3 50T?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 47.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (15.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Antminer S17
Compare Innosilicon T3 50T with...
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3 50T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator