Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Taux de hachage 150.0 TH/s Puissance 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Nerdminer

Nerdminer

Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s Puissance 1 W Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Nerdminer

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Nerdminer
150.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s
3,230 W Consommation électrique 1 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.8 kg Weight 0.1 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 3 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 35/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006786 BTC $4.33
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$3.42
Monthly -$102.54
Yearly -$1,247.57

Nerdminer

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.00
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.07
Yearly -$0.88

Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1466 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 299999999900% more hashrate (150.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1466's favour. That said, the Nerdminer isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1466 and Nerdminer actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Avalon A1466 299999999900% more hashrate (150.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Nerdminer 100% better power draw (3,230.0 vs 1.0 W)
  • Avalon A1466 100% better efficacité (21.5 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH)
  • Nerdminer 100% better weight (12.8 vs 0.1 kg)
  • Avalon A1466 324041% more heat output (11,020.8 vs 3.4 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1466 3% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 35.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Nerdminer
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $29
-$3.42 Daily net profit -$0.00
-$5,448 Net after 1 year -$30
-$6,695 Net after 2 years -$31
-$7,943 Net after 3 years -$32
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1466

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Avalon A1466 or Nerdminer more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Nerdminer is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.42/day for the Avalon A1466. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or Nerdminer?

The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Nerdminer at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Avalon A1466 vs Nerdminer: which fits a residential setup better?

The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 35/100 for the Nerdminer). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Nerdminer?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Nerdminer runs at 20,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 19,999,978.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (21.5 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH).