Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1466

Avalon A1466

Taux de hachage 150.0 TH/s Puissance 3,230 W Efficiency 21.5 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 43T

Innosilicon T3 43T

Taux de hachage 43.0 TH/s Puissance 2,100 W Efficiency 48.8 J/TH

Avalon A1466 vs Innosilicon T3 43T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1466 Specification Innosilicon T3 43T
150.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 43.0 TH/s
3,230 W Consommation électrique 2,100 W
21.5 J/TH Efficiency 48.8 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.8 kg Weight 10.0 kg
11,021 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1466

Daily Revenue 0.00006786 BTC $4.34
Daily Electricity -$7.75
Daily Profit -$3.41
Monthly -$102.27
Yearly -$1,244.25

Innosilicon T3 43T

Daily Revenue 0.00001945 BTC $1.25
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.79
Monthly -$113.85
Yearly -$1,385.17

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1466 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 249% more hashrate (150.0 vs 43.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T3 43T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Avalon A1466 — l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Avalon A1466 and Innosilicon T3 43T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Avalon A1466 249% more hashrate (150.0 vs 43.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 43T 35% better power draw (3,230 vs 2,100 W)
  • Avalon A1466 56% better efficacité (21.5 vs 48.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T3 43T 22% better weight (12.8 vs 10.0 kg)
  • Avalon A1466 54% more heat output (11,021 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1466 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Avalon A1466 Metric Innosilicon T3 43T
$4,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,500
-$3.41 Daily net profit -$3.79
-$5,444 Net after 1 year -$2,885
-$6,688 Net after 2 years -$4,270
-$7,933 Net after 3 years -$5,656
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1466

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Avalon A1466

21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Avalon A1466 or the Innosilicon T3 43T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1466 is more profitable at $-3.41/day compared to $-3.79/day for the Innosilicon T3 43T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Avalon A1466 or Innosilicon T3 43T?

The Avalon A1466 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 43T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1466 or the Innosilicon T3 43T?

The Avalon A1466 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 43T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1466 and Innosilicon T3 43T?

The Avalon A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 43T runs at 48.8 J/TH — a difference of 27.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (21.5 vs 48.8 J/TH).