Avalon A1566 vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Avalon A1566 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 6067% more hashrate (185.0 vs 3.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1566's favour. That said, the Bitaxe Hex isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1566 and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1566 6067% more hashrate (185.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 97% better power draw (3,420.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Avalon A1566 38% better efficacité (18.5 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 97% better weight (14.9 vs 0.5 kg)
- Avalon A1566 3700% more heat output (11,669 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Hex 78% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$2.95 | Daily net profit | -$0.13 |
| -$6,577 | Net after 1 year | -$447 |
| -$7,654 | Net after 2 years | -$494 |
| -$8,730 | Net after 3 years | -$542 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe HexScore: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A156618.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1566 or the Bitaxe Hex?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-2.95/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1566 or the Bitaxe Hex better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Avalon A1566 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1566 or Bitaxe Hex?
The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Avalon A1566). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Avalon A1566 vs Bitaxe Hex: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 11.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (18.5 vs 30.0 J/TH).