Canaan Avalon Q vs Bitaxe Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Q | Specification | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,674 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 18.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 10.5 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 5,712 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Q
Bitaxe Ultra
Based on BTC price of $62,245 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Q, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 17900% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon Q's favour. That said, the Bitaxe Ultra isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Q and Bitaxe Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon Q 17900% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 99% better power draw (1,674.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 38% better efficacité (18.6 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Ultra 22% better noise (45.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Ultra 97% better weight (10.5 vs 0.3 kg)
- Canaan Avalon Q 11056% more heat output (5,711.7 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 25% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon Q | Metric | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $1,292 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$1.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$1,833 | Net after 1 year | -$87 |
| -$2,374 | Net after 2 years | -$95 |
| -$2,916 | Net after 3 years | -$103 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon Q vs Bitaxe Ultra: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-1.48/day for the Canaan Avalon Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon Q or Bitaxe Ultra?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon Q at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan Avalon Q vs Bitaxe Ultra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Canaan Avalon Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon Q vs Bitaxe Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 11.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (18.6 vs 30.0 J/TH).