Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Canaan Avalon Q

Canaan Avalon Q

Taux de hachage 90.0 TH/s Puissance 1,674 W Efficiency 18.6 J/TH
VS
Holic H22

Holic H22

Taux de hachage 22.0 TH/s Puissance 1,700 W Efficiency 77.3 J/TH

Canaan Avalon Q vs Holic H22

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan Avalon Q Specification Holic H22
90.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 22.0 TH/s
1,674 W Consommation électrique 1,700 W
18.6 J/TH Efficiency 77.3 J/TH
45 dB Niveau de bruit
10.5 kg Weight
5,712 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,800 BTU/hr
56/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Holic

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan Avalon Q

Daily Revenue 0.00004142 BTC $3.20
Daily Electricity -$4.02
Daily Profit -$0.82
Monthly -$24.60
Yearly -$299.36

Holic H22

Daily Revenue 0.00001012 BTC $0.78
Daily Electricity -$4.08
Daily Profit -$3.30
Monthly -$98.95
Yearly -$1,203.92

Based on BTC price of $77,202 and current network difficulty as of May 26, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Q edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 76% better efficacité (18.6 vs 77.3 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon Q's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Canaan Avalon Q — l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon Q and Holic H22 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Canaan Avalon Q 309% more hashrate (90.0 vs 22.0 TH/s)
  • Canaan Avalon Q 2% better power draw (1,674 vs 1,700 W)
  • Canaan Avalon Q 76% better efficacité (18.6 vs 77.3 J/TH)
  • Holic H22 2% more heat output (5,712 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
  • Canaan Avalon Q 100% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Canaan Avalon Q Metric Holic H22
$1,292 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.82 Daily net profit -$3.30
-$1,591 Net after 1 year -$1,204
-$1,890 Net after 2 years -$2,408
-$2,190 Net after 3 years -$3,612
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon Q

Score: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon Q

18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Canaan Avalon Q vs Holic H22: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-3.30/day for the Holic H22. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Canaan Avalon Q or the Holic H22 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Holic H22 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Canaan Avalon Q vs Holic H22: which fits a residential setup better?

The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Holic H22). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Canaan Avalon Q vs Holic H22: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH while the Holic H22 runs at 77.3 J/TH — a difference of 58.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (18.6 vs 77.3 J/TH).