Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 14% better efficacité (25.0 vs 29.0 J/TH). The Whatsminer M50 holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 and Whatsminer M50 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 14% more hashrate (130 vs 114 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 2% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,306 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 14% better efficacité (25.0 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50 4% better weight (13.0 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 2% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$4.04 | Daily net profit | -$4.64 |
| -$2,175 | Net after 1 year | -$4,294 |
| -$3,651 | Net after 2 years | -$5,988 |
| -$5,127 | Net after 3 years | -$7,681 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 vs Whatsminer M50: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 is more profitable at $-4.04/day compared to $-4.64/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 or the Whatsminer M50 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 or the Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 and Whatsminer M50?
The Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 4.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (25.0 vs 29.0 J/TH).