Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe GT

Bitaxe GT

Taux de hachage 5.0 TH/s Puissance 75 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E10

Ebang Ebit E10

Taux de hachage 18.0 TH/s Puissance 1,650 W Efficiency 91.7 J/TH

Bitaxe GT vs Ebang Ebit E10

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe GT Specification Ebang Ebit E10
5.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 18.0 TH/s
75 W Consommation électrique 1,650 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 91.7 J/TH
42 dB Niveau de bruit
0.4 kg Weight 9.8 kg
256 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,630 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe GT

Daily Revenue 0.00000226 BTC $0.14
Daily Electricity -$0.18
Daily Profit -$0.04
Monthly -$1.07
Yearly -$12.97

Ebang Ebit E10

Daily Revenue 0.00000814 BTC $0.52
Daily Electricity -$3.96
Daily Profit -$3.44
Monthly -$103.20
Yearly -$1,255.57

Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe GT edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,650.0 W). The Ebang Ebit E10 claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe GT — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe GT and Ebang Ebit E10 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Ebang Ebit E10 260% more hashrate (5.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe GT 95% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,650.0 W)
  • Bitaxe GT 84% better efficacité (15.0 vs 91.7 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe GT 96% better weight (0.4 vs 9.8 kg)
  • Ebang Ebit E10 2100% more heat output (256 vs 5,630 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe GT 129% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe GT Metric Ebang Ebit E10
$499 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.04 Daily net profit -$3.44
-$512 Net after 1 year -$1,256
-$525 Net after 2 years -$2,511
-$538 Net after 3 years -$3,767
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe GT

Score: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe GT

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe GT or Ebang Ebit E10 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $-0.04/day compared to $-3.44/day for the Ebang Ebit E10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe GT or Ebang Ebit E10?

The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitaxe GT or the Ebang Ebit E10?

The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitaxe GT and Ebang Ebit E10 on J/TH?

The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E10 runs at 91.7 J/TH — a difference of 76.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (15.0 vs 91.7 J/TH).