Bitaxe Ultra vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Ultra | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 1,077 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Ultra
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Ultra edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 1,077.0 W). The Ebang Ebit E9 holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe Ultra and Ebang Ebit E9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Ebang Ebit E9 1160% more hashrate (0.5 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 99% better power draw (15.0 vs 1,077.0 W)
- Bitaxe Ultra 82% better efficacité (30.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E9 7077% more heat output (51.2 vs 3,674.7 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 126% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitaxe Ultra | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$2.40 |
| -$87 | Net after 1 year | -$1,247 |
| -$95 | Net after 2 years | -$2,124 |
| -$103 | Net after 3 years | -$3,001 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Ultra30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Ultra or the Ebang Ebit E9?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-2.40/day for the Ebang Ebit E9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Ultra or Ebang Ebit E9?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Ultra or Ebang Ebit E9?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitaxe Ultra and Ebang Ebit E9 on J/TH?
The Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 141.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (30.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).