Bitaxe Ultra vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Ultra | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 74.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 3,330 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Ultra
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitaxe Ultra, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,330.0 W). The StrongU Hornbill H8 holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitaxe Ultra and StrongU Hornbill H8 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- StrongU Hornbill H8 14700% more hashrate (0.5 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,330.0 W)
- Bitaxe Ultra 33% better efficacité (30.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Ultra 97% better weight (0.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 22091% more heat output (51.2 vs 11,362.0 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 218% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitaxe Ultra | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $79 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$0.02 | Daily net profit | -$5.90 |
| -$87 | Net after 1 year | -$3,353 |
| -$95 | Net after 2 years | -$5,506 |
| -$103 | Net after 3 years | -$7,659 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Ultra30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Ultra or the StrongU Hornbill H8?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-5.90/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitaxe Ultra or the StrongU Hornbill H8 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the StrongU Hornbill H8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Ultra or StrongU Hornbill H8?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitaxe Ultra vs StrongU Hornbill H8: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 15.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (30.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).