Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-KS Max

iBeLink BM-KS Max

Taux de hachage 11.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 309.1 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DSM7T

iBeLink DSM7T

Taux de hachage 7.0 TH/s Puissance 2,100 W Efficiency 300.0 J/TH

iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink DSM7T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-KS Max Specification iBeLink DSM7T
11.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 7.0 TH/s
3,400 W Consommation électrique 2,100 W
309.1 J/TH Efficiency 300.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
12.2 kg Weight 15.6 kg
11,601 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme Blake256r14
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-KS Max

Daily Revenue 0.00000498 BTC $0.37
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$7.79
Monthly -$233.82
Yearly -$2,844.82

iBeLink DSM7T

Daily Revenue 0.00000317 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.81
Monthly -$144.21
Yearly -$1,754.59

Based on BTC price of $73,543 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Le iBeLink BM-KS Max et le iBeLink DSM7T sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.

Spec Deltas

The iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink DSM7T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iBeLink BM-KS Max 57% more hashrate (11.0 vs 7.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink DSM7T 38% better power draw (3,400 vs 2,100 W)
  • iBeLink DSM7T 3% better efficacité (309 vs 300 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-KS Max 22% better weight (12.2 vs 15.6 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-KS Max 62% more heat output (11,601 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink BM-KS Max 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

iBeLink BM-KS Max Metric iBeLink DSM7T
$1,799 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.79 Daily net profit -$4.81
-$4,644 Net after 1 year -$1,755
-$7,489 Net after 2 years -$3,509
-$10,333 Net after 3 years -$5,264
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink BM-KS Max

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DSM7T

300.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or iBeLink DSM7T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DSM7T is more profitable at $-4.81/day compared to $-7.79/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink DSM7T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink DSM7T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink DSM7T?

The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DSM7T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink DSM7T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink DSM7T runs at 300.0 J/TH — a difference of 9.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (309 vs 300 J/TH).